As the demand for hygiene and sanitation increases, antimicrobial treatments have become more common in the textile industry. Complying with relevant standards plays a vital role in ensuring textile products with antimicrobial treatments are effective and safe for consumers, as well as meeting any commercial claims made.
In this article, we will highlight testing standards for the antimicrobial treatment of textile products, particularly AATCC 100, AATCC 30, and AATCC 147 standards.
Antimicrobial treatments are increasingly common in the textile industry nowadays. These treatments can provide benefits such as improving hygiene, controlling odor, and preserving textile products.
In real-life scenarios such as hospital linens, food industry textiles, sports apparel and footwear and other items that require a high level of cleanliness, antimicrobial treatments can help to prevent the growth of bacteria and other microorganisms. They can also help to control unpleasant odors caused by microbial growth and extend the life cycle of textile products by preventing the growth of microorganisms that can degrade or damage the fabric over time.
Brands and retailers can differentiate their products by adding antimicrobial treatments. However, they need to ensure that their products meet relevant safety and efficacy standards. They also must ensure that commercial claims placed on their products are properly substantiated with relevant testing that demonstrates so and that the antimicrobial treatments withstand a certain degree of use over time (i.e. efficacy after a given number of washes needs to be substantiated as well).
Below, we will focus on the three best-known standards developed by the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) that are used to test the effectiveness of antimicrobial treatments on textile products, named AATCC 100, AATCC 30, and AATCC 147.
AATCC 100 is a standard method that measures the effectiveness of antibacterial finishes on textile materials.
This standard tests both bacteriostatic activity (growth inhibition) and bactericidal activity (killing of bacteria) of the sample.
The test involves exposing a treated textile sample to a bacterial suspension and then measuring the reduction in bacterial growth on the sample over a 24 hours of contact.
Antibacterial activity is determined by comparing the reduction in the viable count of bacteria on the treated sample with the untreated sample.
AATCC 30 is a standard method that measures the effectiveness of antifungal treatments on textile materials.
The purpose of AATCC 30 is to determine the ability of a treated textile material to resist the growth of fungi. The test involves exposing a treated textile sample to a suspension of fungal spores and then measuring the reduction in fungal growth on the sample over time.
There are four types of testing under this standard:
AATCC 147, also known as the Parallel Streak method, is a standard method to determine the bacteriostatic activity of diffusible antimicrobial finishes on textile materials.
The method is relatively easy to perform and provides reproducible results. It offers an alternative to the more involved AATCC 100, making it a great screening tool.
However, this is a qualitative test method (while AATCC 100 is a quantitative method) and it does not apply to textile materials that cannot be diffused through bacterial growth medium or that have been impregnated with any antibacterial-neutralising substances.
We provide a range of tests to evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial finishes using a variety of microbiological testing methods that conform to either international standards or the client’s specific requirements.
To ensure a comprehensive assessment, we utilise the most widely-recognised and accepted testing methods for antibacterial and antifungal evaluations in the industry.
For more details, learn more about our Microbiology Testing Services.
Related Article/Webinar Text and Link
Related Article/Webinar Text and Link
Related Article/Webinar Text and Link