
Validate versus verify
Verification can be expressed as “are you testing it right?” whereas validation can be expressed as “are you testing the right thing?
Deploying pivotal biomarker data as surrogate endpoints in clinical studies require advanced method validation augmenting CAP/CLIA verification. To meet the needs of our clients and regulatory bodies, the most tested attributes in advanced validation may include, but are not limited to:
Selectivity
Specificity
Accuracy
Precision
Reproducibility
Limit of detection
Limit of quantification
Calibration curve
System suitability
The applied rigor of data documentation, record keeping and reporting, may need to be similar to that of methods for pharmacokinetic support and require GCLP or GLP like method development and method validation.
As more and more biomarker tests become available on clinical analysers, the limitations, as well as the strengths of these analytical instruments and tests, should be considered. Clinical analysers are in most cases highly automated and closed systems (“black boxes”) with limited possibilities to modify or optimize the assays.
Eurofins Central Laboratory is uniquely positioned to validate clinical biomarker assay kits with its biomarker services by uniting GCLP and CLIA in one synergetic approach. Our hybrid system allows us to combine best of two worlds when utilising laboratory biomarkers to prove safety and efficacy, support go/no-go decisions, stratify patients and to support the submission of data sets to regulatory agencies worldwide.